Adds up the 19 permits of this company; where permits overlap, the loss counts twice.
Loss means tree cover was removed: clearing, but also plantation harvest or fire. It is not a finding of illegal deforestation, and the data is yearly, not monthly.
Company profile and coverage
What is realistically knowable for this kind of company, what we have, and what is still missing
Coverage has not been computed for this company yet.
Visible with a free account · company profile (identifiers, PROPER, EITI)Sign in
Needs: Metadata Indikator TPB (Bappenas) + RAD TPB per province/regency
Not connected yet
Trend per indicator (on track / moderate / stagnating / decreasing)
Sources
Kementerian ESDM geoportal (Minerba / Monaresia Wilayah Pertambangan), via legacy Eco Mining Data harvest · geoportal.esdm.go.id · retrieved 18 Oct 2026 · signal · unknown
Eco Mining Data computation: current permit geometries (ESDM) × area; overlap with WDPA protected areas · computed by Eco Mining Data · as of 18 Oct 2026 · signal · derived from the ESDM permit layer and WDPA (WDPA terms apply)Union of current permit geometries clipped to the subject; intersection with protected-area polygons; geodesic area
Eco Mining Data computation: mining footprint (Cheng et al. 2026 · Maus et al. 2022 · ESMI digitised) × subject; inside and outside current ESDM permit geometries · doi.org · computed by Eco Mining Data · as of 31 Dec 2020 · signal · derived from Cheng et al. 2026 and Maus et al. 2022 (CC BY-SA 4.0), ESMI digitised land and the ESDM permit layerFootprint polygons clipped to the subject (geodesic area), counted once where sources overlap (Cheng > Maus > ESMI); the part inside the union of current permit geometries vs outside known permit boundaries (ESDM). Outside is not a finding of illegality: it can be a data gap or an older permit.
Cheng et al. 2026 · Mining land-use classes inside global mining polygons (South-Eastern Asia) · doi.org · as of 31 Dec 2022 · signal · CC BY-SA 4.0
Maus et al. 2022 · Global-scale mining polygons (Version 2) · doi.org · as of 31 Dec 2019 · signal · CC BY-SA 4.0
Hansen Global Forest Change GFC-2025-v1.13 · glad.earthengine.app · as of 31 Dec 2025 · confirmed · CC BY 4.0Hansen, M. C. et al. 2013. High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change. Science 342: 850-53. Data: Global Forest Change 2000-2025 (v1.13), University of Maryland.
KLHK Onlimo water-quality monitoring, via legacy MI · retrieved 18 Oct 2026 · signal · unknown
Needs: Yearly series of the axis A indicators
Not connected yet
Mercury / ASGM sites (unconfirmed signals)
Visible to trusted partners
Reclamation gap (disturbed minus reclaimed)
Visible with a free account
Estimated mining effect per target (DiD / synthetic control)
Needs: Control areas (matching) + yearly series
Not connected yet
Permit change history (ESDM diff)
Needs: Weekly comparison of the ESDM permit register
Needs: Stock-exchange filings (IDX) and annual reports
No data for this subject
Company coverage score
Needs: Company coverage has not been calculated yet; this company is still in the queue.
No data for this subject
Pollution part of the affected area
Needs: Pollution part of the affected area (water, sediment and air measurements); only the physical footprint is measured today
Not connected yet
KLHK ISPU air-quality monitoring, via legacy MI
· retrieved 18 Oct 2026 · signal · unknown
Promise versus reality
What was promised in public documents, next to what the satellite measures on the same land.
No sourced promises are registered for this company yet. Nothing is assumed: a promise appears here only after it was quoted from a public document and checked by a second reviewer.
Reclamation plans, PPKH obligations, reforestation commitments, sustainability-report targets and zero-deforestation pledges are measured against the recovery status and the forest-loss record of the same land.
How this is measured
A promise is a quote of a public document: the source link and its SHA-256 are shown, and it appears here only after review by a second person.
Delivered is the gain in revegetated land since the year of the promise, from the yearly land-cover maps (MapBiomas, to –) on the footprint polygons of the permit or company. Land that is mined again counts against it.
A per-year plan is multiplied by the years in its period. If the deadline lies beyond the data, the amount due is the linear share up to the last data year, and the state is on pace or behind, never missed.
The grade compares delivered with due: A from 90%, B from 70%, C from 40%, D below. The range follows the promise year plus or minus one year, because the maps are yearly.
A zero-deforestation pledge looks at tree-cover loss (Hansen, to –) in the years after the pledge year: A none, B within the noise (1 ha or 0.1% of the tree cover), C up to 1%, D more.
Next to the grade you see the mined land today, new tree-cover loss and how much land was opened versus reclaimed. Before and after frames come from the time machine.
A grade compares a number in a document with a number from space. It does not judge intent or legality.
Where does the ore go
From the mines of this company to the industrial parks that most likely process their ore. What we know, what we infer and what we cannot see are kept apart.
The holder itself runs units in Pomalaa smelter zone (Kolaka)Known relation
The same company runs 2 power units there (60 MW), so the link is likely. Not a delivery record.
Read this first Ore does not always go to the nearest park. A mine can have its own smelter, or sell across regions. Lines marked inferred use straight-line distance within 250 km and are never a delivery record. Ribbon thickness is not a volume.
MineIndustrial parkKnown relationInferred by distance
MineIndustrial parkPortExportBuyer
+2 more permits of this company
Lelilef / Weda Bay industrial zone (Halmahera Tengah)
14 power units · 4,540 MW
Companies in the park
PT Indonesia Weda Bay Industrial Park1,900 MW
PT Angel Nickel Industry760 MW
PT Sunny Metal Industry380 MW
PT Huake Nickel Indonesia250 MW
PT Libai Indonesia Metal Co250 MW
PT Weda Bay Energi250 MW
+3 more
Park units: Global Energy Monitor, Global Integrated Power Tracker (CC BY 4.0, Mar 2026).
Pomalaa smelter zone (Kolaka)
2 power units · 60 MW
Companies in the park
PT Aneka Tambang Tbk60 MW
Park units: Global Energy Monitor, Global Integrated Power Tracker (CC BY 4.0, Mar 2026).
Morosi industrial zone (Konawe)
21 power units · 3,150 MW
Companies in the park
PT Obsidian Stainless Steel2,220 MW
PT Virtue Dragon Nickel Industry530 MW
PT PLN (Persero)400 MW
Park units: Global Energy Monitor, Global Integrated Power Tracker (CC BY 4.0, Mar 2026).
Bahodopi industrial zone (Morowali)
20 power units · 5,570 MW
Companies in the park
PT Sulawesi Mining Investment1,650 MW
PT Indonesia Tsingshan Stainless Steel1,400 MW
Indonesia Wanjia Ferro Nickel Co Ltd380 MW
Indonesia Huaqing Aluminum Co Ltd380 MW
Indonesia Zhaohui Ferro Nickel Co Ltd380 MW
PT Walsin Nickel Industrial Indonesia350 MW
+4 more
Park units: Global Energy Monitor, Global Integrated Power Tracker (CC BY 4.0, Mar 2026).
Distances are straight lines between the centre of the permit and the centre of the park.
Export, buyers and ships need a key
These stages stay empty until a key is in place. We show the gap instead of guessing.
UN ComtradeYearly exports by product and destination country.Waiting for a key
Park units: Global Energy Monitor, Global Integrated Power Tracker (CC BY 4.0, Mar 2026).
Own statements vs independent coverage
Own statements are published by the organisation itself (press releases, IDX disclosures, its own website). Independent coverage comes from media, NGOs, courts, government and aggregators.
Own statement 0 own statements
No own statements found.
Independent 8 independent articles
No independent coverage found.
Connections (organisations mentioned together, regions) are visible with a free account.
Satellite land cover, not reported reclamation: ESDM reclamation reports are not used. Sources: MapBiomas Indonesia Collection 5 (30 m, CC BY-SA 4.0), JRC Tropical Moist Forest; footprint Maus et al. 2022 and Cheng et al. 2026 (CC BY-SA 4.0); ESDM MODI permit layer. Method rec-1.0 · computed Oct 19, 2026
Mining ground
Bare ground
Water
Built-up
Fish or shrimp ponds
Oil palm
Farmland
Tree crops
Shrubs
Forest
Peak mining 3,612 ha in 2023. In 2025: mining ground 3,263 ha, built-up 254 ha, farmland 236 ha.
Show the numbers
Year
Mining ground
Bare ground
Water
Built-up
Fish or shrimp ponds
Oil palm
Farmland
Tree crops
Shrubs
Forest
1990
195
21
376
4
0
1
322
465
796
2,097
1991
195
23
375
4
0
1
327
456
795
2,101
1992
195
38
353
4
0
1
364
469
778
2,075
1993
197
31
348
8
0
1
381
474
770
2,067
1994
211
16
345
19
0
1
375
557
718
2,036
1995
206
18
345
19
0
1
407
460
752
2,069
1996
201
20
350
20
0
1
427
431
757
2,069
1997
209
22
353
20
0
1
418
521
709
2,024
1998
264
37
357
20
0
1
383
508
701
2,006
1999
323
20
358
22
0
1
335
526
710
1,982
2000
338
23
355
22
1
1
328
610
669
1,930
2001
352
29
347
26
1
1
312
739
562
1,908
2002
355
35
343
28
1
1
309
777
539
1,887
2003
340
28
340
41
1
1
302
781
562
1,880
2004
336
39
334
52
1
1
300
930
505
1,777
2005
328
41
329
67
1
1
317
930
510
1,753
2006
329
35
327
67
1
1
363
903
510
1,741
2007
339
55
320
67
0
1
406
876
495
1,716
2008
518
78
306
69
0
1
406
772
452
1,675
2009
610
98
299
70
0
1
436
720
425
1,617
2010
671
156
298
70
0
1
452
680
406
1,542
2011
1,259
319
278
73
0
2
355
382
309
1,298
2012
1,778
636
210
75
13
2
319
350
183
711
2013
2,555
358
153
122
14
2
257
353
122
341
2014
2,881
148
144
134
14
2
258
325
112
259
2015
2,957
115
142
146
14
3
259
294
103
244
2016
2,976
128
145
159
8
2
254
286
102
217
2017
3,056
168
146
182
2
3
221
250
80
168
2018
3,291
148
142
187
3
4
198
167
60
76
2019
3,535
118
122
193
1
5
163
58
34
48
2020
3,580
92
114
202
6
7
149
54
31
41
2021
3,567
86
110
227
6
8
151
52
32
39
2022
3,591
74
106
234
5
8
136
56
30
35
2023
3,612
65
89
241
6
10
129
63
31
31
2024
3,554
77
98
245
6
11
149
70
36
33
2025
3,263
109
99
254
9
11
236
85
113
96
Mining ground
Bare ground
Water
Built-up
Fish or shrimp ponds
Oil palm
Farmland
Tree crops
Shrubs
Forest
Peak mining 3,612 ha in 2023. In 2025: mining ground 3,263 ha, built-up 254 ha, farmland 236 ha.
Show the numbers
Year
Mining ground
Bare ground
Water
Built-up
Fish or shrimp ponds
Oil palm
Farmland
Tree crops
Shrubs
Forest
1990
195
21
376
4
0
1
322
465
796
2,097
1991
195
23
375
4
0
1
327
456
795
2,101
1992
195
38
353
4
0
1
364
469
778
2,075
1993
197
31
348
8
0
1
381
474
770
2,067
1994
211
16
345
19
0
1
375
557
718
2,036
1995
206
18
345
19
0
1
407
460
752
2,069
1996
201
20
350
20
0
1
427
431
757
2,069
1997
209
22
353
20
0
1
418
521
709
2,024
1998
264
37
357
20
0
1
383
508
701
2,006
1999
323
Whole footprint polygons, including parts outside this subject.
20
358
22
0
1
335
526
710
1,982
2000
338
23
355
22
1
1
328
610
669
1,930
2001
352
29
347
26
1
1
312
739
562
1,908
2002
355
35
343
28
1
1
309
777
539
1,887
2003
340
28
340
41
1
1
302
781
562
1,880
2004
336
39
334
52
1
1
300
930
505
1,777
2005
328
41
329
67
1
1
317
930
510
1,753
2006
329
35
327
67
1
1
363
903
510
1,741
2007
339
55
320
67
0
1
406
876
495
1,716
2008
518
78
306
69
0
1
406
772
452
1,675
2009
610
98
299
70
0
1
436
720
425
1,617
2010
671
156
298
70
0
1
452
680
406
1,542
2011
1,259
319
278
73
0
2
355
382
309
1,298
2012
1,778
636
210
75
13
2
319
350
183
711
2013
2,555
358
153
122
14
2
257
353
122
341
2014
2,881
148
144
134
14
2
258
325
112
259
2015
2,957
115
142
146
14
3
259
294
103
244
2016
2,976
128
145
159
8
2
254
286
102
217
2017
3,056
168
146
182
2
3
221
250
80
168
2018
3,291
148
142
187
3
4
198
167
60
76
2019
3,535
118
122
193
1
5
163
58
34
48
2020
3,580
92
114
202
6
7
149
54
31
41
2021
3,567
86
110
227
6
8
151
52
32
39
2022
3,591
74
106
234
5
8
136
56
30
35
2023
3,612
65
89
241
6
10
129
63
31
31
2024
3,554
77
98
245
6
11
149
70
36
33
2025
3,263
109
99
254
9
11
236
85
113
96
Who owns this
From this company up to its group and down to its permits. Every link shows where it comes from and how sure we are.
Registered holder
PT Aneka Tambang TbkConfidence C
PT Tbk
19 permits
The name in the official permit register. That is not always the company that owns the business.
Beneficial owner (the people behind it)
Not available
The beneficial owner register of the Indonesian company authority (AHU / OSS) is only open under a formal agreement. Until then we do not guess names.
PT Aneka Tambang Tbk is owned by PT Mineral Industri Indonesia (Persero)Confidence C65% stakeSource: Wikidata Q12472074 — Aneka Tambang (CC0 1.0), as of 23 Oct 2026
PT Aneka Tambang Tbk is a subsidiary of Daya Anagata Nusantara Investment Management AgencyConfidence CSource: Wikidata Q109237452 — MIND ID (CC0 1.0), as of 23 Oct 2026
PT Aneka Tambang Tbk is a subsidiary of Government of IndonesiaConfidence CSource: Wikidata Q109237452 — MIND ID (CC0 1.0), as of 23 Oct 2026
Ribbon thickness shows the stake where we know it. Dashed means a weaker or unstated link. A name is shown only for companies: natural persons are never named here.
PT Galuh Cempaka is a subsidiary of PT Aneka Tambang TbkConfidence C20% stakeSource: Wikidata Q118757433 — Galuh Cempaka (CC0 1.0), as of 23 Oct 2026
PT Sumberdaya Arindo is a subsidiary of PT Aneka Tambang TbkConfidence C100% stakeSource: Wikidata Q118714570 — Sumberdaya Arindo (CC0 1.0), as of 23 Oct 2026
PT Weda Bay Nickel is a subsidiary of PT Aneka Tambang TbkConfidence C10% stakeSource: Wikidata Q118759103 — Weda Bay Nickel (CC0 1.0), as of 23 Oct 2026