Kabupaten Puncak

SDG scorecard

Three axes, never merged into one number

No SDG goal has a score yet for this subject (10 goals checked). What is needed is listed under “What we don’t know yet”.

No goal rated orange or red with the data available.

A · Context status

How the area is doing on measured SDG indicators (SDSN normalisation, 0–100).

Reliability D0 of 12 indicators with data

River water quality (pollution index) · 6.3.2
Data gap · no data for this subject
—
Air quality (ISPU, proxy for PM2.5) · 11.6.2
Data gap · no data for this subject
—
Population below the national poverty line · 1.2.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: BPS Susenas (regency) / SDGs Desa · planned in S2
—
Stunting in children under five · 2.2.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: SKI / Riskesdas (Kemenkes) · planned in S2
—
Mortality from air pollution · 3.9.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: CAMS / Sentinel-5P exposure + GBD · planned in S2
—
Lower-secondary completion rate · 4.1.2
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: BPS Indikator TPB / PODES · planned in S2
—
Households with safe drinking water · 6.1.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: PODES (BPS) / SDGs Desa · planned in S2
—
Access to electricity · 7.1.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: PODES (BPS) / VIIRS night lights · planned in S2
—
Unemployment rate · 8.5.2
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: BPS Sakernas (regency) · planned in S2
—
Coastal sediment and tailings plumes · 14.1.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: Sentinel-2/3 plume detection · planned in S2
—
Forest cover and annual loss · 15.1.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: Hansen GFC / MapBiomas Indonesia · planned in S2
—
Degraded land (UNCCD method) · 15.3.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: Trends.Earth (land cover, productivity, soil carbon) · planned in S2
—

B · Target gap and trend

Distance to RPJMN 2025–2029 / RAD TPB targets and the trend per indicator.

Reliability D0 of 2 indicators with data

Distance to RPJMN 2025-2029 / RAD TPB targets
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: Indikator TPB metadata (Bappenas) + RAD TPB per province/regency · planned in S2
—
Trend per indicator (on track / moderate / stagnating / decreasing)
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: Yearly series of the axis A indicators · planned in S2
—

C · Mining

Exposure to mining, shown raw. Not attribution: the causal model (DiD, synthetic control) follows in S3.

Reliability B4 of 8 indicators with data · oldest input 31 Dec 2019

Share of the area under mining permits · 15.1
–^[2]
0 %
Permits overlapping protected areas · 15.5
–^[2]
0 ha
Mercury / ASGM sites (unconfirmed signals) · 12.4
Visible with a free account
ASGM signals outside any permit · 15.3
Visible with a free account
Mining footprint (satellite) · 15.3
31 Dec 2019^[3]
0 ha
Mining footprint outside known permit boundaries (ESDM) · 15.3
31 Dec 2019^[3]

No imputation: an indicator without data stays visibly empty. Goalposts and thresholds are in the indicator register.

Questions about this area

Precomputed answers from Eco Mining Data, with source, date and grade. Gaps say what is missing.

What is the EAI (Environmental Affected Index) of this area, and which component weighs most?

Answered

2EAI

EAI 2 (low). Heaviest component: Recovery backlog. 56% of components have data.

For Kabupaten Puncak
Grade C

Sources · Method

Eco Mining Data EAI v1 (Environmental Affected Index; method in STATUS-answers.md)
Mining footprint: Cheng et al. 2026, Maus et al. 2022 (v2), ESMI digitised; counted once · Maus, V. et al. (2022) Scientific Data 9, 289; Cheng et al. (2026) · CC BY 4.0 / CC BY-SA 4.0
KLHK Onlimo river water-quality stations (Indeks Pencemaran) · public government data
KLHK ISPU air-quality stations · public government data
World Database on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC / IUCN) · WDPA terms (non-commercial; attribution)
Eco Mining Data news engine (headlines as published; events extracted, counted)

Method: eai.v1

Free account needed to follow

How much affected land lies outside every permit, per province?

Locked

Visible with a free account · Free account needed to follow

Which permits lie in this area (type, commodity, status, validity)?

Answered

0permits

0 permits (0 ha), 0 currently valid. Most common commodity: –.

For Kabupaten Puncak
Grade B
Data as of 18 Oct 2026

Sources · Method

Kementerian ESDM — Minerba concession register (geoportal) · public register · 18 Oct 2026

Method: Current ESDM permit geometries; region by location (1022)

Free account needed to follow

Do permits overlap protected areas, state forest (kawasan hutan), customary (adat) land or the sea?

Answered

0ha

0 ha of 0 permits (of 0) overlaps protected areas (WDPA).

For Kabupaten Puncak
Grade C
Data as of 18 Oct 2026

Details with a free account

Sources · Method · Partial answer

Kementerian ESDM — Minerba concession register (geoportal) · public register · 18 Oct 2026
World Database on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC / IUCN) · WDPA terms (non-commercial; attribution)

Method: Current permit geometry ∩ WDPA protected areas (1012)

Partial answer: Overlap with protected areas (WDPA); kawasan hutan, adat land and the sea are not loaded yet.

Missing: KLHK kawasan hutan · BRWA (registratie adat-gebieden)

Free account needed to follow

What is the air quality (PM2.5, PM10, SO₂, NO₂) around mines and smelters, today and historically?

Answered

01e15 molec/cm²

No ground station here. Satellite: NO₂ column 0 × 10¹⁵ molec/cm² above background (–; ± 0); SO₂ – DU above background. Column density, not ground-level air.

For Kabupaten Puncak
Grade C
Data as of 1 Sept 2026 outdated

Sources · Method · Partial answer

Sentinel-5P TROPOMI tropospheric NO2, KNMI TEMIS monthly means v1.0 (0.125°) · van Geffen et al. 2022, AMT 15, 2037-2060 · Copernicus Sentinel data, free and open with attribution · 1 Sept 2026

Method: Sentinel-5P tropospheric NO2 column enhancement over a local background, mean of the newest 12 months (strongest of the regency mean and its industrial zones). Satellite column density, not a ground concentration and not a health exposure value

Partial answer: ISPU stations in the region; Sentinel-5P, CAMS and NEA are not connected yet.

Missing: CAMS (Copernicus atmosfeer: analyses en voorspellingen) · NEA Singapore (PSI/PM2.5 per uur, data.gov.sg) + ASMC (ASEAN-nevelkaarten)

Free account needed to follow

Where do most new alerts come from this week/month?

Answered

0alerts

0 confirmed alerts in the last 30 days (0 in the last 7 days). Newest alert: 10 Aug 2026.

For Kabupaten Puncak
Grade C
Data as of 10 Aug 2026 outdated

Details to verified organisations

Sources · Method · Partial answer

Eco Watch alerts (Eco Mining Data; confirmed after four-eyes review)

Method: Eco Watch alerts in the last 7 / 30 days; public count = confirmed only, unconfirmed signals counted for T3 in region scope

Partial answer: Eco Watch alerts (confirmed in public; unconfirmed signals counted for verified organisations only). RADD/GLAD and own detection are not live yet.

Missing: RADD/GLAD forest-loss alerts · Sentinel-1

Free account needed to follow

Social: Conflicts, displacement, safety (accidents, collapses at PETI sites)

Answered

0events

0 reported conflicts, accidents or disasters in 24 months (0 confirmed). Most frequent: –.

For Kabupaten Puncak
Grade D
Data as of 18 Oct 2026

Sources · Method · Partial answer

Eco Mining Data news engine (headlines as published; events extracted, counted) · 18 Oct 2026

Method: Media-reported conflicts, accidents, disasters and spills (24 months); counted, mostly unconfirmed, no organisation named

Partial answer: Media-reported conflicts, accidents and disasters (counted, mostly unconfirmed, no organisations named); police and field data not yet.

Missing: GDELT (wereldwijd nieuws, geotagged) · Field reports

Free account needed to follow

Land value: What will the land be worth?

Locked

Visible with a free account · Free account needed to follow

Which companies have the largest restoration backlog (affected minus restored)?

Locked

Visible to verified organisations · Free account needed to follow

Which mining companies cause the most damage? (absolute, per hectare of permit and per tonne produced)

No data here

No data for this place yet.

Missing:

Mining footprint · no mapped mining footprint here

Is river water downstream turbid or polluted, and since when?

No data here

No data for this place yet.

Missing:

KLHK Onlimo / Sentinel-2 turbidity · no Onlimo river station in this region

What is the latest news about this area?

No data here

No data for this place yet.

Missing:

News engine / GDELT · no news linked to this region yet

How much forest has disappeared here due to mining, per year, and how much from other causes?

No data here

No data for this place yet.

Missing:

Hansen × Maus (province) · no provincial mining-deforestation series

Which threatened species (IUCN) live here, and how much habitat has been lost?

Data gap

Not answerable yet: the data is not in Eco Mining Data.

Missing:

IUCN Red List, GBIF, iNaturalist, eBird · source not connected yet
Model: STAR, habitatverlies · method not built yet

Health: How many people are exposed to mercury, arsenic, PM2.5 or polluted water, and what does that cost in health?

Data gap

Not answerable yet: the data is not in Eco Mining Data.

Missing:

Kemenkes (SKI/Riskesdas, SatuSehat-aggregaten) · source not connected yet
ESVD (waarden ecosysteemdiensten), IHME GBD (ziektelast) · source not connected yet

Impact Ledger

Natural-capital account (SEEA-EA style): stock, condition and change, physical units.

Extent
Item	Opening	Closing	Change	Period	Grade	Source
Mining footprint	–	2,416 ha	–	2026	C	Mining footprint: Cheng et al. 2026, Maus et al. 2022 (v2), ESMI digitised; counted once · 31 Dec 2022
Footprint inside permits	–	2,404 ha	–	2026	C	Mining footprint: Cheng et al. 2026, Maus et al. 2022 (v2), ESMI digitised; counted once · 31 Dec 2022
Footprint outside known permits	–	11.8 ha	–	2026	C	Mining footprint: Cheng et al. 2026, Maus et al. 2022 (v2), ESMI digitised; counted once · 31 Dec 2022
Permit area	–	149,703 ha	–	2026	B	Kementerian ESDM — Minerba concession register (geoportal) · 18 Oct 2026
Permits in protected areas	–	7,060 ha	–	2026	C	Kementerian ESDM — Minerba concession register (geoportal) · 18 Oct 2026

Condition
Item	Value	Period	Grade	Source
Air quality (ISPU)	10 ISPU	2026	B	KLHK ISPU air-quality stations
Footprint share of land	0 %	2026	C	Mining footprint: Cheng et al. 2026, Maus et al. 2022 (v2), ESMI digitised; counted once · 31 Dec 2022

Values in Rp (ecosystem services) are a data gap until ESVD valuation is connected. · il.v1

Land value

Kabupaten Puncak · Rp per m², market-equivalent today: P50 with the P10–P90 band

Land use	Value (P50, band)	Basis	Year	Grade	Source
Agriculture	Rp 9,108 (2,874–28,863)	National (fallback)	2018 stale	D	BPS Survei Struktur Ongkos Usaha Hortikultura (SOUH) 2018, sewa lahan per ha · capitalised rent · +8
Plantation	Rp 7,034 (2,220–22,292)	National (fallback)	2014 stale	D	BPS SOUT 2014 kelapa sawit (via Bisnis.com 24 Dec 2014) · capitalised rent
Degraded mining land · model value	Rp 0 (0–0)	Model	2018 stale	D	BPS Survei Struktur Ongkos Usaha Hortikultura (SOUH) 2018, sewa lahan per ha · capitalised rent · +8

Model: comparable agriculture land Rp 9,108/m² minus expected reclamation ≈ Rp 65,045/m² (commodity unknown). Reclamation costs more than the land is worth: net −Rp 59,989/m², so its value is 0 (98% of model runs negative).

NJOP and compensation values are converted to market-equivalent and older years CPI-indexed. A fallback value is borrowed from a wider area and has a wider band and a lower grade. Not an appraisal. · landvalue.v1 · API (observations: Tier 1)

Value after restoration

What restoring abandoned mining land that is still bare or water could be worth, in rupiah. Figures for Kabupaten Puncak.

Model estimate, not an appraisal.

MapBiomas mining-class measure

Every 30 m pixel that MapBiomas ever labelled as a mining pit and that is now abandoned and still bare or water.

Net gain

Rp 362 mP10–P90 Rp 104–926 mgrade D

Net present value over 25 years at 10 % a year.

Land counted: 6 ha · abandoned, still bare or water
Payback: 2 yrs
Gain per rupiah of cost: 0.8×

Footprint measure

Land inside the mapped mining footprint polygons that is abandoned and still bare or water.

No abandoned bare or water land in this measure here.

The two measures overlap. They are shown side by side and never added together. tn = trillion, bn = billion, m = million (rupiah). The letter after a figure is its grade (A best, D a rough model estimate); the range is P10–P90.

MapBiomas mining-class measure · Every 30 m pixel that MapBiomas ever labelled as a mining pit and that is now abandoned and still bare or water. 2.3 ha still bare and 3.7 ha water (pit lakes).

From value now to net gain

Value now → value after restoration, plus what restoration adds for everyone, minus the costs, gives the net gain.

Value now (degraded land)model value−Rp 3.6 bnP10–P90 −Rp 5.4 bn – −Rp 1.76 bngrade D
Value after restorationmodel valueRp 441 mP10–P90 Rp 247 m – Rp 1.2 bngrade D

The value now is negative: the land is worth less than nothing until it is reclaimed. That is shown but not counted as gain; the restoration costs are counted instead.

Gain in land valuemodel valueRp 365 mP10–P90 Rp 204–991 mgrade D
Ecosystem servicesmodel valueRp 280 mP10–P90 Rp 188–397 mgrade D
CarbonRp 14 mP10–P90 Rp 5.71–26.4 mgrade D
Avoided downstream impactsmodel valueRp 97.6 mP10–P90 Rp 52.4–166 mgrade D
Restoration costsRp 452 mP10–P90 Rp 387–529 mgrade D
Remediation

Shown, not added

Plan income (capitalised)model valueRp 250 mP10–P90 Rp 170–371 mgrade D
Reclamation duty dischargedRp 4.37 bnP10–P90 Rp 2.82–6.35 bngrade D

By permit zone

Permit zone	Land	Net gain
Inside an expired or revoked permit: reclamation duty applies	–	–
Inside an active permit	–	–
Inside a permit with another statusPending, suspended or unknown status.	–	–
Outside known permit boundaries (ESDM)This can be a gap in the ESDM permit layer or an older permit: the layer lists current permits only.	6 ha	Rp 362 mP10–P90 Rp 104–926 mgrade D

Who benefits

How the benefits are shared, before costs (median path). Benefit-sharing defaults from the Restoration Studio: 80 % cooperative, 20 % village fund.

LandownerThe gain in land value.Rp 314 mgrade D44 %
CooperativePlan income above the land value and the community share of carbon (80 % stays in the cooperative).Rp 8.3 mgrade D1 %
Village fund20 % of the community share goes to the village fund.Rp 2.07 mgrade D0 %
Government and the publicEcosystem services and avoided downstream impacts.Rp 376 mgrade D53 %
Project developerThe rest of the carbon value.Rp 6.91 mgrade D1 %

Source and grade of every part

Part	Per hectare	Source
Value now (degraded land)model valueToday's use value of the degraded land: comparable land value minus the cost of reclamation. It can be negative. A negative value is shown but not counted as gain, because the restoration costs are counted below.	−Rp 600 m/haP10–P90 −Rp 900 m/ha – −Rp 294 m/hagrade D	Eco Mining Data land value: degraded mining land = comparable value − reclamation cost (model value, not floored at zero)
Value after restorationmodel valueThe larger of the comparable land value and the capitalised plan income, never both.	Rp 73.5 m/haP10–P90 Rp 41.2–200 m/hagrade D	The larger of (b) the comparable land value (agriculture/plantation; pit lakes × water factor) and (a) the capitalised plan income
Plan income (capitalised)model valueIncome of a default restoration plan (forest, agroforestry, cassava fields, fish cages in pit lakes) over 25 years, discounted. Used in the value after restoration only when it is the larger of the two.	Rp 41.6 m/haP10–P90 Rp 28.3–61.7 m/hagrade D	Restoration Studio option economics (Sulawesi Utara price table applied nationally), default plan mix per commodity; present value of operating income over the plan period
Gain in land valuemodel value

National overview Recovery status after mining

Model estimate, not an appraisal. Eco Mining Data model restorevalue.v1: 2,000 Monte Carlo draws, run of 20 October 2026. Bands are P10–P90.

Value after restoration

What restoring abandoned mining land that is still bare or water could be worth, in rupiah. Figures for Kabupaten Puncak.

Model estimate, not an appraisal.

MapBiomas mining-class measure

Every 30 m pixel that MapBiomas ever labelled as a mining pit and that is now abandoned and still bare or water.

Net gain

Rp 362 mP10–P90 Rp 104–926 mgrade D

Net present value over 25 years at 10 % a year.

Land counted: 6 ha · abandoned, still bare or water
Payback: 2 yrs
Gain per rupiah of cost: 0.8×

Footprint measure

Land inside the mapped mining footprint polygons that is abandoned and still bare or water.

No abandoned bare or water land in this measure here.

MapBiomas mining-class measure · Every 30 m pixel that MapBiomas ever labelled as a mining pit and that is now abandoned and still bare or water. 2.3 ha still bare and 3.7 ha water (pit lakes).

From value now to net gain

Value now → value after restoration, plus what restoration adds for everyone, minus the costs, gives the net gain.

Value now (degraded land)model value−Rp 3.6 bnP10–P90 −Rp 5.4 bn – −Rp 1.76 bngrade D
Value after restorationmodel valueRp 441 mP10–P90 Rp 247 m – Rp 1.2 bngrade D

The value now is negative: the land is worth less than nothing until it is reclaimed. That is shown but not counted as gain; the restoration costs are counted instead.

Gain in land valuemodel valueRp 365 mP10–P90 Rp 204–991 mgrade D
Ecosystem servicesmodel valueRp 280 mP10–P90 Rp 188–397 mgrade D
CarbonRp 14 mP10–P90 Rp 5.71–26.4 mgrade D
Avoided downstream impactsmodel valueRp 97.6 mP10–P90 Rp 52.4–166 mgrade D
Restoration costsRp 452 mP10–P90 Rp 387–529 mgrade D
Remediation

Shown, not added

Plan income (capitalised)model valueRp 250 mP10–P90 Rp 170–371 mgrade D
Reclamation duty dischargedRp 4.37 bnP10–P90 Rp 2.82–6.35 bngrade D

By permit zone

Permit zone	Land	Net gain
Inside an expired or revoked permit: reclamation duty applies	–	–
Inside an active permit	–	–
Inside a permit with another statusPending, suspended or unknown status.	–	–
Outside known permit boundaries (ESDM)This can be a gap in the ESDM permit layer or an older permit: the layer lists current permits only.	6 ha	Rp 362 mP10–P90 Rp 104–926 mgrade D

Who benefits

How the benefits are shared, before costs (median path). Benefit-sharing defaults from the Restoration Studio: 80 % cooperative, 20 % village fund.

LandownerThe gain in land value.Rp 314 mgrade D44 %
CooperativePlan income above the land value and the community share of carbon (80 % stays in the cooperative).Rp 8.3 mgrade D1 %
Village fund20 % of the community share goes to the village fund.Rp 2.07 mgrade D0 %
Government and the publicEcosystem services and avoided downstream impacts.Rp 376 mgrade D53 %
Project developerThe rest of the carbon value.Rp 6.91 mgrade D1 %

Source and grade of every part

Part	Per hectare	Source
Value now (degraded land)model valueToday's use value of the degraded land: comparable land value minus the cost of reclamation. It can be negative. A negative value is shown but not counted as gain, because the restoration costs are counted below.	−Rp 600 m/haP10–P90 −Rp 900 m/ha – −Rp 294 m/hagrade D	Eco Mining Data land value: degraded mining land = comparable value − reclamation cost (model value, not floored at zero)
Value after restorationmodel valueThe larger of the comparable land value and the capitalised plan income, never both.	Rp 73.5 m/haP10–P90 Rp 41.2–200 m/hagrade D	The larger of (b) the comparable land value (agriculture/plantation; pit lakes × water factor) and (a) the capitalised plan income
Plan income (capitalised)model valueIncome of a default restoration plan (forest, agroforestry, cassava fields, fish cages in pit lakes) over 25 years, discounted. Used in the value after restoration only when it is the larger of the two.	Rp 41.6 m/haP10–P90 Rp 28.3–61.7 m/hagrade D	Restoration Studio option economics (Sulawesi Utara price table applied nationally), default plan mix per commodity; present value of operating income over the plan period
Gain in land valuemodel value

National overview Recovery status after mining

Model estimate, not an appraisal. Eco Mining Data model restorevalue.v1: 2,000 Monte Carlo draws, run of 20 October 2026. Bands are P10–P90.

Ecosystem servicesmodel valueNon-market value of the restored land, such as water regulation and habitat (benefit transfer from de Groot et al. 2012).	Rp 46.6 m/haP10–P90 Rp 31.3–66.1 m/hagrade D	de Groot, R. et al. 2012. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services 1: 50-61 (biome means). Benefits transferred at 0.25-1× the mean (most likely 0.5). Cultivated land: no extra non-market value counted.

CarbonCarbon credits from replanting, after buffer, leakage and uncertainty deductions, at a placeholder price.	Rp 2.33 m/haP10–P90 Rp 950,671/ha – Rp 4.39 m/hagrade D	Restoration Studio carbon profiles × (1 − buffer − leakage − uncertainty) × carbon price, minus measurement and issuance costs

Avoided downstream impactsmodel valueAvoided sediment, flooding and water-treatment costs downstream. A model value, not a measurement.	Rp 16.3 m/haP10–P90 Rp 8.73–27.7 m/hagrade D	MODEL value: avoided sediment, flooding and water-treatment costs downstream of restored mining land, Rp/ha/yr. No Indonesian per-hectare study found; ESMI assumption, to be replaced by causal estimates.

RemediationRegrading, soil and water testing, labour, and POCO compost with microbes where metals are expected.	Rp 41.2 m/haP10–P90 Rp 35.2–48.3 m/hagrade D	Restoration Studio remediation costs: regrading, XRF and lab sampling, labour, POCO + microbes on the share of land with metals

PlantingSeedlings, compost and planting for the plan mix.	Rp 28.3 m/haP10–P90 Rp 23.5–34.5 m/hagrade D	Restoration Studio option costs (planting, seedlings, compost) of the plan mix

Restoration costsRemediation and planting, plus a contingency.	Rp 75.3 m/haP10–P90 Rp 64.5–88.1 m/hagrade D	Remediation + planting + contingency

Reclamation duty dischargedThe reclamation duty that restoration would discharge. It is a transfer between parties (who pays): shown, not added to the gain.	Rp 728 m/haP10–P90 Rp 469 m/ha – Rp 1.06 bn/hagrade D	Reclamation standard (Kepmen ESDM 344.K/MB.01/MEM.B/2025, IKK-adjusted): the duty restoration discharges. A TRANSFER (who pays), not added to the gain

Net gainmodel valueGain in land value + ecosystem services + carbon + avoided downstream impacts − restoration costs.	Rp 60.4 m/haP10–P90 Rp 17.4–154 m/hagrade D	Net gain = (value after − today's use value) + ecosystem services + carbon + avoided downstream impacts − costs; present value, model estimate, not an appraisal

Questions about this area

Precomputed answers from Eco Mining Data, with source, date and grade. Gaps say what is missing.

What is the EAI (Environmental Affected Index) of this area, and which component weighs most?

Answered

2EAI

EAI 2 (low). Heaviest component: Recovery backlog. 56% of components have data.

For Kabupaten Puncak
Grade C

Sources · Method

Eco Mining Data EAI v1 (Environmental Affected Index; method in STATUS-answers.md)
Mining footprint: Cheng et al. 2026, Maus et al. 2022 (v2), ESMI digitised; counted once · Maus, V. et al. (2022) Scientific Data 9, 289; Cheng et al. (2026) · CC BY 4.0 / CC BY-SA 4.0
KLHK Onlimo river water-quality stations (Indeks Pencemaran) · public government data
KLHK ISPU air-quality stations · public government data
World Database on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC / IUCN) · WDPA terms (non-commercial; attribution)
Eco Mining Data news engine (headlines as published; events extracted, counted)

Method: eai.v1

Free account needed to follow

How much affected land lies outside every permit, per province?

Locked

Visible with a free account · Free account needed to follow

Which permits lie in this area (type, commodity, status, validity)?

Answered

0permits

0 permits (0 ha), 0 currently valid. Most common commodity: –.

For Kabupaten Puncak
Grade B
Data as of 18 Oct 2026

Sources · Method

Kementerian ESDM — Minerba concession register (geoportal) · public register · 18 Oct 2026

Method: Current ESDM permit geometries; region by location (1022)

Free account needed to follow

Do permits overlap protected areas, state forest (kawasan hutan), customary (adat) land or the sea?

Answered

0ha

0 ha of 0 permits (of 0) overlaps protected areas (WDPA).

For Kabupaten Puncak
Grade C
Data as of 18 Oct 2026

Details with a free account

Sources · Method · Partial answer

Kementerian ESDM — Minerba concession register (geoportal) · public register · 18 Oct 2026
World Database on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC / IUCN) · WDPA terms (non-commercial; attribution)

Method: Current permit geometry ∩ WDPA protected areas (1012)

Partial answer: Overlap with protected areas (WDPA); kawasan hutan, adat land and the sea are not loaded yet.

Missing: KLHK kawasan hutan · BRWA (registratie adat-gebieden)

Free account needed to follow

What is the air quality (PM2.5, PM10, SO₂, NO₂) around mines and smelters, today and historically?

Answered

01e15 molec/cm²

No ground station here. Satellite: NO₂ column 0 × 10¹⁵ molec/cm² above background (–; ± 0); SO₂ – DU above background. Column density, not ground-level air.

For Kabupaten Puncak
Grade C
Data as of 1 Sept 2026 outdated

Sources · Method · Partial answer

Sentinel-5P TROPOMI tropospheric NO2, KNMI TEMIS monthly means v1.0 (0.125°) · van Geffen et al. 2022, AMT 15, 2037-2060 · Copernicus Sentinel data, free and open with attribution · 1 Sept 2026

Partial answer: ISPU stations in the region; Sentinel-5P, CAMS and NEA are not connected yet.

Missing: CAMS (Copernicus atmosfeer: analyses en voorspellingen) · NEA Singapore (PSI/PM2.5 per uur, data.gov.sg) + ASMC (ASEAN-nevelkaarten)

Free account needed to follow

Where do most new alerts come from this week/month?

Answered

0alerts

0 confirmed alerts in the last 30 days (0 in the last 7 days). Newest alert: 10 Aug 2026.

For Kabupaten Puncak
Grade C
Data as of 10 Aug 2026 outdated

Details to verified organisations

Sources · Method · Partial answer

Eco Watch alerts (Eco Mining Data; confirmed after four-eyes review)

Method: Eco Watch alerts in the last 7 / 30 days; public count = confirmed only, unconfirmed signals counted for T3 in region scope

Partial answer: Eco Watch alerts (confirmed in public; unconfirmed signals counted for verified organisations only). RADD/GLAD and own detection are not live yet.

Missing: RADD/GLAD forest-loss alerts · Sentinel-1

Free account needed to follow

Social: Conflicts, displacement, safety (accidents, collapses at PETI sites)

Answered

0events

0 reported conflicts, accidents or disasters in 24 months (0 confirmed). Most frequent: –.

For Kabupaten Puncak
Grade D
Data as of 18 Oct 2026

Sources · Method · Partial answer

Eco Mining Data news engine (headlines as published; events extracted, counted) · 18 Oct 2026

Method: Media-reported conflicts, accidents, disasters and spills (24 months); counted, mostly unconfirmed, no organisation named

Partial answer: Media-reported conflicts, accidents and disasters (counted, mostly unconfirmed, no organisations named); police and field data not yet.

Missing: GDELT (wereldwijd nieuws, geotagged) · Field reports

Free account needed to follow

Land value: What will the land be worth?

Locked

Visible with a free account · Free account needed to follow

Which companies have the largest restoration backlog (affected minus restored)?

Locked

Visible to verified organisations · Free account needed to follow

Which mining companies cause the most damage? (absolute, per hectare of permit and per tonne produced)

No data here

No data for this place yet.

Missing:

Mining footprint · no mapped mining footprint here

Is river water downstream turbid or polluted, and since when?

No data here

No data for this place yet.

Missing:

KLHK Onlimo / Sentinel-2 turbidity · no Onlimo river station in this region

What is the latest news about this area?

No data here

No data for this place yet.

Missing:

News engine / GDELT · no news linked to this region yet

How much forest has disappeared here due to mining, per year, and how much from other causes?

No data here

No data for this place yet.

Missing:

Hansen × Maus (province) · no provincial mining-deforestation series

Which threatened species (IUCN) live here, and how much habitat has been lost?

Data gap

Not answerable yet: the data is not in Eco Mining Data.

Missing:

IUCN Red List, GBIF, iNaturalist, eBird · source not connected yet
Model: STAR, habitatverlies · method not built yet

Health: How many people are exposed to mercury, arsenic, PM2.5 or polluted water, and what does that cost in health?

Data gap

Not answerable yet: the data is not in Eco Mining Data.

Missing:

Kemenkes (SKI/Riskesdas, SatuSehat-aggregaten) · source not connected yet
ESVD (waarden ecosysteemdiensten), IHME GBD (ziektelast) · source not connected yet

Impact Ledger

Natural-capital account (SEEA-EA style): stock, condition and change, physical units.

Extent
Item	Opening	Closing	Change	Period	Grade	Source
Mining footprint	–	2,416 ha	–	2026	C	Mining footprint: Cheng et al. 2026, Maus et al. 2022 (v2), ESMI digitised; counted once · 31 Dec 2022
Footprint inside permits	–	2,404 ha	–	2026	C	Mining footprint: Cheng et al. 2026, Maus et al. 2022 (v2), ESMI digitised; counted once · 31 Dec 2022
Footprint outside known permits	–	11.8 ha	–	2026	C	Mining footprint: Cheng et al. 2026, Maus et al. 2022 (v2), ESMI digitised; counted once · 31 Dec 2022
Permit area	–	149,703 ha	–	2026	B	Kementerian ESDM — Minerba concession register (geoportal) · 18 Oct 2026
Permits in protected areas	–	7,060 ha	–	2026	C	Kementerian ESDM — Minerba concession register (geoportal) · 18 Oct 2026

Condition
Item	Value	Period	Grade	Source
Air quality (ISPU)	10 ISPU	2026	B	KLHK ISPU air-quality stations
Footprint share of land	0 %	2026	C	Mining footprint: Cheng et al. 2026, Maus et al. 2022 (v2), ESMI digitised; counted once · 31 Dec 2022

Values in Rp (ecosystem services) are a data gap until ESVD valuation is connected. · il.v1

SDG scorecard

A · Context status

B · Target gap and trend

C · Mining

Facts

Mining footprint

Forest loss

Per year (last ten)

Questions about this area

Impact Ledger

Air above the smelter

Land value

Value after restoration

From value now to net gain

Shown, not added

By permit zone

Who benefits

Permits

Permit holders

Timeline

Media timeline

News river

Observations

What we don't know yet

Sources

Media timeline

News river

Land value

Value after restoration

From value now to net gain

Shown, not added

By permit zone

Who benefits

Questions about this area

Impact Ledger

Air above the smelter