CV Suraindo Bara · Company · Eco Mining Data

Company · sources as of 19 Oct 2026

CV Suraindo Bara

1,784 ha · Kalimantan Selatan · You see this dossier without an account.

Includes news mentions and reported events (signals).

Export

Is this your company? Claim the profile for free with your registration number or work e-mail.

See alerts on your permits
Correct facts with evidence
Right of reply on findings

Built from public sources (ESDM, AHU, KLHK) and ESMI satellite analysis. Not written or endorsed by the company. Every change is logged.

In short

1 permit is registered for this company.^[1]

Protected area: Not inside a protected area
Mining footprint (satellite): 11.8 ha of the 1,784 ha (0.7%) shows mining disturbance on satellite images.^[3]

Permits1^[1]Kementerian ESDM geoportal (Minerba / Monaresia Wilayah Pertambangan), via legacy Eco Mining Data harvest · signal
Mining footprint (satellite)12 ha^[3]Eco Mining Data computation: mining footprint (Cheng et al. 2026 · Maus et al. 2022 · ESMI digitised) × subject; inside and outside current ESDM permit geometries · signal
Permits in protected areas0 ha^[2]Eco Mining Data computation: current permit geometries (ESDM) × area; overlap with WDPA protected areas · signal

What we don’t know yet (23)

NO₂ in the air above background (satellite)
Schools within 5 km of mining footprint
Health facilities within 5 km of mining footprint

See all gaps

Open on the map Recovery on the map Plan restoration for these sites

Own boundaries (ESDM permits, WDPA protected areas); no satellite imagery.

Under permit

1,784ha^[2]

Visible with a secured profile · Export (PDF, CSV, KML, GeoJSON)Sign in

SDG scorecard

Three axes, never merged into one number

32/100

16/100

41/100

7 more goals have no data yet (see “What we don’t know yet”).

Biggest gaps: SDG 11 (Major challenges) · SDG 6 (Significant challenges) · SDG 15 (Significant challenges)

A · Context status

How the area is doing on measured SDG indicators (SDSN normalisation, 0–100).

Reliability C4 of 14 indicators with data · oldest input 31 Dec 2025 · 3 out of date

River water quality (pollution index) · 6.3.2
1 inputs · 24 Jun 2026 · out of date^[7]
4.2 IPSignificant challenges · 64/100
Air quality (ISPU, proxy for PM2.5) · 11.6.2
1 inputs · 9 Aug 2026 · out of date^[8]
130 ISPUMajor challenges · 16/100
Population below the national poverty line · 1.2.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: BPS Susenas (regency) / SDGs Desa · planned in S2
—
Stunting in children under five · 2.2.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: SKI / Riskesdas (Kemenkes) · planned in S2
—
Mortality from air pollution · 3.9.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: CAMS / Sentinel-5P exposure + GBD · planned in S2
—
NO₂ in the air above background (satellite) · 11.6.2
Data gap · no data for this subject
—
Lower-secondary completion rate · 4.1.2
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: BPS Indikator TPB / PODES · planned in S2
—
River stations above the pollution limit · 6.3.2
1 inputs · 24 Jun 2026 · out of date^[7]
100 %Major challenges · 0/100
Households with safe drinking water · 6.1.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: PODES (BPS) / SDGs Desa · planned in S2
—
Access to electricity · 7.1.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: PODES (BPS) / VIIRS night lights · planned in S2
—
Unemployment rate · 8.5.2
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: BPS Sakernas (regency) · planned in S2
—
Coastal sediment and tailings plumes · 14.1.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: Sentinel-2/3 plume detection · planned in S2
—
Tree cover left (canopy in 2000 minus loss since) · 15.1.1
1 inputs · 31 Dec 2025 · current^[6]
40.9 %Significant challenges · 41/100
Degraded land (UNCCD method) · 15.3.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: Trends.Earth (land cover, productivity, soil carbon) · planned in S2
—

B · Target gap and trend

Distance to RPJMN 2025–2029 / RAD TPB targets and the trend per indicator.

Reliability D0 of 2 indicators with data

Distance to RPJMN 2025-2029 / RAD TPB targets
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: Indikator TPB metadata (Bappenas) + RAD TPB per province/regency · planned in S2
—
Trend per indicator (on track / moderate / stagnating / decreasing)
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: Yearly series of the axis A indicators · planned in S2
—

C · Mining

Exposure to mining, shown raw. Not attribution: the causal model (DiD, synthetic control) follows in S3.

Reliability C4 of 10 indicators with data · oldest input 31 Dec 2019

Permits overlapping protected areas · 15.5
18 Oct 2026 · current^[2]
0 ha
Mercury / ASGM sites (unconfirmed signals) · 12.4
Visible to trusted partners
Mining footprint (satellite) · 15.3
10 inputs · 31 Dec 2019^[3]
11.8 ha
Reclamation gap (disturbed minus reclaimed) · 15.3
Visible with a free account
Forest lost in the last 5 data years · 15.2
1 inputs · 31 Dec 2025 · current^[6]
98.1 ha
Permits within 5 km of mangrove · 14.2

No imputation: an indicator without data stays visibly empty. Goalposts and thresholds are in the indicator register.

What we don't know yet

23 gaps

Population below the national poverty line
Needs: BPS Susenas (regency) / SDGs Desa
Not connected yet
Stunting in children under five
Needs: SKI / Riskesdas (Kemenkes)
Not connected yet
Mortality from air pollution
Needs: CAMS / Sentinel-5P exposure + GBD
Not connected yet
NO₂ in the air above background (satellite)
No data for this subject
Lower-secondary completion rate
Needs: BPS Indikator TPB / PODES
Not connected yet
Households with safe drinking water
Needs: PODES (BPS) / SDGs Desa
Not connected yet
Access to electricity
Needs: PODES (BPS) / VIIRS night lights
Not connected yet
Unemployment rate
Needs: BPS Sakernas (regency)
Not connected yet
Coastal sediment and tailings plumes
Needs: Sentinel-2/3 plume detection
Not connected yet
Degraded land (UNCCD method)
Needs: Trends.Earth (land cover, productivity, soil carbon)
Not connected yet
Distance to RPJMN 2025-2029 / RAD TPB targets
Needs: Metadata Indikator TPB (Bappenas) + RAD TPB per province/regency
Not connected yet
Trend per indicator (on track / moderate / stagnating / decreasing)
Needs: Yearly series of the axis A indicators
Not connected yet
Mercury / ASGM sites (unconfirmed signals)
Visible to trusted partners
Reclamation gap (disturbed minus reclaimed)
Visible with a free account
Schools within 5 km of mining footprint
No data for this subject
Health facilities within 5 km of mining footprint
No data for this subject
Abandoned mining land still bare or water (5+ years)
No data for this subject
Estimated mining effect per target (DiD / synthetic control)
Needs: Control areas (matching) + yearly series
Not connected yet
Permit change history (ESDM diff)
Needs: Weekly comparison of the ESDM permit register
Source is empty
Ultimate beneficial owners
Needs: Ultimate beneficial owners (AHU/OSS extract)
Not connected yet
Financial figures
Needs: Stock-exchange filings (IDX) and annual reports
No data for this subject
Company coverage score
Needs: Company coverage has not been calculated yet; this company is still in the queue.
No data for this subject
Pollution part of the affected area
Needs: Pollution part of the affected area (water, sediment and air measurements); only the physical footprint is measured today
Not connected yet

Sources

Kementerian ESDM geoportal (Minerba / Monaresia Wilayah Pertambangan), via legacy Eco Mining Data harvest · geoportal.esdm.go.id · retrieved 18 Oct 2026 · signal · unknown
Eco Mining Data computation: current permit geometries (ESDM) × area; overlap with WDPA protected areas · computed by Eco Mining Data · as of 18 Oct 2026 · signal · derived from the ESDM permit layer and WDPA (WDPA terms apply)Union of current permit geometries clipped to the subject; intersection with protected-area polygons; geodesic area
Eco Mining Data computation: mining footprint (Cheng et al. 2026 · Maus et al. 2022 · ESMI digitised) × subject; inside and outside current ESDM permit geometries · doi.org · computed by Eco Mining Data · as of 31 Dec 2019 · signal · derived from Cheng et al. 2026 and Maus et al. 2022 (CC BY-SA 4.0), ESMI digitised land and the ESDM permit layerFootprint polygons clipped to the subject (geodesic area), counted once where sources overlap (Cheng > Maus > ESMI); the part inside the union of current permit geometries vs outside known permit boundaries (ESDM). Outside is not a finding of illegality: it can be a data gap or an older permit.
Cheng et al. 2026 · Mining land-use classes inside global mining polygons (South-Eastern Asia) · doi.org · as of 31 Dec 2022 · signal · CC BY-SA 4.0
Maus et al. 2022 · Global-scale mining polygons (Version 2) · doi.org · as of 31 Dec 2019 · signal · CC BY-SA 4.0
Hansen Global Forest Change GFC-2025-v1.13 · glad.earthengine.app · as of 31 Dec 2025 · confirmed · CC BY 4.0Hansen, M. C. et al. 2013. High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change. Science 342: 850-53. Data: Global Forest Change 2000-2025 (v1.13), University of Maryland.
KLHK Onlimo water-quality monitoring, via legacy MI · retrieved 18 Oct 2026 · signal · unknown
KLHK ISPU air-quality monitoring, via legacy MI · retrieved 18 Oct 2026 · signal · unknown
Eco Mining Data computation: distance from each permit polygon to the nearest Global Mangrove Watch polygon (CC BY 4.0), search radius 50 km · www.globalmangrovewatch.org · computed by Eco Mining Data · as of 18 Oct 2026 · signal · derived from Global Mangrove Watch (CC BY 4.0) and the ESDM permit layerStraight-line distance between polygons; proximity, not a measured effect

Show the numbers

Year	Mining ground	Bare ground	Water	Built-up	Oil palm	Farmland	Tree crops	Shrubs	Forest
1990	0	0	0	0	106	90	693	27	0
1991	0	0	0	0	56	98	674	87	1
1992	0	0	0	0	55	97	664	99	1
1993	0	0	0	0	55	99	661	100	1
1994	0	0	0	0	53	101	660	101	1
1995	0	0	0	0	53	97	661	104	1
1996	0	0	0	0	53	96	661	105	1
1997	0	0	0	0	53	99	656	107	1
1998	0	0	0	0	55	102	207	551	2
1999	0	0	0	0	55	103	193	564	2
2000	1	0	0	0	54	76	95	687	2
2001	1	0	0	0	54	78	92	690	2
2002	9	0	0	0	53	67	81	704	2
2003	10	0	0	0	53	65	75	712	2
2004	10	0	0	0	87	71	69	680	0
2005	10	2	0	0	100	69	48	688	0
2006	6	3	0	0	100	73	47	687	0
2007	15	1	0	0	109	69	52	671	0
2008	15	8	0	0	119	68	51	656	0
2009	34	0	0	0	124	62	67	629	0
2010	34	1	0	0	135	53	70	624	0
2011	37	0	0	0	136	48	89	607	0
2012	56	0	0	0	136	39	87	598	0
2013	139	2	0	0	137	22	97	520	0
2014	271	5	0	0	141	30	91	380	0
2015	312	6	1	0	144	27	88	340	0
2016	346	11	1	0	145	29	87	298	0
2017	384	66	2	2	145	28	70	220	0
2018	569	57	1	3	143	19	33	93	0
2019	655	45	1	3	142	11	13	46	0
2020	638	45	5	3	142	34	10	41	0
2021	634	48	9	3	142	36	9	36	0
2022	622	54	14	3	143	46	6	29	0
2023	614	54	22	4	145	50	1	26	0
2024	577	66	22	4	149	62	1	37	0
2025	515	75	34	14	148	89	1	40	0

Mining ground
Bare ground
Water
Built-up
Oil palm
Farmland
Tree crops
Shrubs
Forest

Peak mining 655 ha in 2019. In 2025: mining ground 515 ha, oil palm 148 ha, farmland 89 ha.

Show the numbers

Year	Mining ground	Oil palm	Farmland	Tree crops	Shrubs	Forest
1990	0	106	90	693	27	0
1991	0	56	98	674	87	1
1992	0	55	97	664	99	1
1993	0	55	99	661	100	1
1994	0	53	101	660	101	1
1995	0	53	97	661	104	1
1996	0	53	96	661	105	1
1997	0	53	99	656	107	1
1998	0	55	102	207	551	2
1999	0	55	103	193	564	2
2000	1

CV Suraindo Bara

Is this your company? Claim the profile for free with your registration number or work e-mail.

SDG scorecard

A · Context status

B · Target gap and trend

C · Mining

Facts

Who owns this

Holder changes

Where does the ore go

Mining footprint

Per source (own polygons)

Forest loss

Per year (last ten)

Recovery after mining

Area by status

Key years

Promise versus reality

Company profile and coverage

Permits

Timeline

Own statements vs independent coverage

Own statement 0 own statements

Independent 0 independent articles

Mention volume

Tone over time

Right of reply

Observations

Financial and production figures

History of this profile