PT Berkat Asia Mineralindo · Company · Eco Mining Data

Company · sources as of 22 Oct 2026

PT Berkat Asia Mineralindo

197 ha · Kepulauan Bangka Belitung · You see this dossier without an account.

Includes news mentions and reported events (signals).

Export

Is this your company? Claim the profile for free with your registration number or work e-mail.

See alerts on your permits
Correct facts with evidence
Right of reply on findings

Built from public sources (ESDM, AHU, KLHK) and ESMI satellite analysis. Not written or endorsed by the company. Every change is logged.

In short

1 permit is registered for this company.^[1]

Protected area: Not inside a protected area
Mining footprint (satellite): 2 ha of the 197 ha (1%) shows mining disturbance on satellite images.^[3]

Permits1^[1]Kementerian ESDM geoportal (Minerba / Monaresia Wilayah Pertambangan), via legacy Eco Mining Data harvest · signal
Mining footprint (satellite)2 ha^[3]Eco Mining Data computation: mining footprint (Cheng et al. 2026 · Maus et al. 2022 · ESMI digitised) × subject; inside and outside current ESDM permit geometries · signal
Permits in protected areas0 ha^[2]Eco Mining Data computation: current permit geometries (ESDM) × area; overlap with WDPA protected areas · signal

What we don’t know yet (24)

Air quality (ISPU, proxy for PM2.5)
NO₂ in the air above background (satellite)
Schools within 5 km of mining footprint

See all gaps

Open on the map Recovery on the map Plan restoration for these sites

Own boundaries (ESDM permits, WDPA protected areas); no satellite imagery.

Under permit

197ha^[2]

Ending within 12 months

Visible with a secured profile · Export (PDF, CSV, KML, GeoJSON)Sign in

SDG scorecard

Three axes, never merged into one number

29/100

54/100

8 more goals have no data yet (see “What we don’t know yet”).

Biggest gaps: SDG 6 (Significant challenges)

A · Context status

How the area is doing on measured SDG indicators (SDSN normalisation, 0–100).

Reliability D3 of 14 indicators with data · oldest input 31 Dec 2025

River water quality (pollution index) · 6.3.2
2 inputs · 21 Oct 2026 · current^[7]
4.8 IPSignificant challenges · 58/100
Air quality (ISPU, proxy for PM2.5) · 11.6.2
Data gap · no data for this subject
—
Population below the national poverty line · 1.2.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: BPS Susenas (regency) / SDGs Desa · planned in S2
—
Stunting in children under five · 2.2.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: SKI / Riskesdas (Kemenkes) · planned in S2
—
Mortality from air pollution · 3.9.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: CAMS / Sentinel-5P exposure + GBD · planned in S2
—
NO₂ in the air above background (satellite) · 11.6.2
Data gap · no data for this subject
—
Lower-secondary completion rate · 4.1.2
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: BPS Indikator TPB / PODES · planned in S2
—
River stations above the pollution limit · 6.3.2
2 inputs · 21 Oct 2026 · current^[7]
100 %Major challenges · 0/100
Households with safe drinking water · 6.1.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: PODES (BPS) / SDGs Desa · planned in S2
—
Access to electricity · 7.1.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: PODES (BPS) / VIIRS night lights · planned in S2
—
Unemployment rate · 8.5.2
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: BPS Sakernas (regency) · planned in S2
—
Coastal sediment and tailings plumes · 14.1.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: Sentinel-2/3 plume detection · planned in S2
—
Tree cover left (canopy in 2000 minus loss since) · 15.1.1
1 inputs · 31 Dec 2025 · current^[6]
53.5 %Challenges remain · 54/100
Degraded land (UNCCD method) · 15.3.1
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: Trends.Earth (land cover, productivity, soil carbon) · planned in S2
—

B · Target gap and trend

Distance to RPJMN 2025–2029 / RAD TPB targets and the trend per indicator.

Reliability D0 of 2 indicators with data

Distance to RPJMN 2025-2029 / RAD TPB targets
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: Indikator TPB metadata (Bappenas) + RAD TPB per province/regency · planned in S2
—
Trend per indicator (on track / moderate / stagnating / decreasing)
Data gap · source not connected yet · Needs: Yearly series of the axis A indicators · planned in S2
—

C · Mining

Exposure to mining, shown raw. Not attribution: the causal model (DiD, synthetic control) follows in S3.

Reliability C4 of 10 indicators with data · oldest input 31 Dec 2019

Permits overlapping protected areas · 15.5
18 Oct 2026 · current^[2]
0 ha
Mercury / ASGM sites (unconfirmed signals) · 12.4
Visible to trusted partners
Mining footprint (satellite) · 15.3
2 inputs · 31 Dec 2019^[3]
2 ha
Reclamation gap (disturbed minus reclaimed) · 15.3
Visible with a free account
Forest lost in the last 5 data years · 15.2
1 inputs · 31 Dec 2025 · current^[6]
31.9 ha
Permits within 5 km of mangrove · 14.2

No imputation: an indicator without data stays visibly empty. Goalposts and thresholds are in the indicator register.

Recovery after mining

What the land inside the mining footprint looks like from space, year by year (1990–2025)

Natural regrowth

After mining, shrubs or forest came back slowly by themselves.

Footprint polygons: 1
Ever disturbed: 0.5 ha
Vegetation back: 0.4 ha
Abandoned ≥ 5 years, still bare or water: 0 ha

Figures are sums over all polygons; the status of a group is the status with the largest area.

Area by status

Actively mined0.1 ha 4 %
Natural regrowth0.3 ha 13 %
Managed restoration0.2 ha 8 %
Not visible at 30 m1.6 ha 75 %

Key years

First mining: 1996
Peak mining: 2012
Last mining: 2025
Mining stopped: –

Mining ground
Bare ground
Water
Built-up
Oil palm
Farmland
Tree crops
Shrubs
Forest

Peak mining 593 ha in 2012. In 2025: farmland 528 ha, mining ground 357 ha, shrubs 171 ha.

Show the numbers

Year	Mining ground	Bare ground	Water	Built-up	Oil palm	Farmland	Tree crops	Shrubs	Forest
1990	4	70	28	0	1	182	0	704	228
1991	0	83	19	4	1	180	0	703	228
1992	0	87	13	4	1	189	0	698	225
1993	1	87	9	4	1	199	0	691	226
1994	1	98	9	4	1	204	0	674	227
1995	1	117	9	4	1	206	0	657	222
1996	14	100	8	4	1	192	0	675	223
1997	16	93	8	5	1	176	0	696	223
1998	24	86	8	5	1	162	0	708	224
1999	50	58	10	5	2	163	0	709	221
2000	57	51	10

Whole footprint polygons, including parts outside this subject.

Status per polygon

Free account · Status per polygon, with confidence, the rule that decided it and its life history, needs a free account.

Show on the map National overview

Satellite land cover, not reported reclamation: ESDM reclamation reports are not used. Sources: MapBiomas Indonesia Collection 5 (30 m, CC BY-SA 4.0), JRC Tropical Moist Forest; footprint Maus et al. 2022 and Cheng et al. 2026 (CC BY-SA 4.0); ESDM MODI permit layer. Method rec-1.0 · computed Oct 19, 2026

What we don't know yet

24 gaps

Air quality (ISPU, proxy for PM2.5)
No data for this subject
Population below the national poverty line
Needs: BPS Susenas (regency) / SDGs Desa
Not connected yet
Stunting in children under five
Needs: SKI / Riskesdas (Kemenkes)
Not connected yet
Mortality from air pollution
Needs: CAMS / Sentinel-5P exposure + GBD
Not connected yet
NO₂ in the air above background (satellite)
No data for this subject
Lower-secondary completion rate
Needs: BPS Indikator TPB / PODES
Not connected yet
Households with safe drinking water
Needs: PODES (BPS) / SDGs Desa
Not connected yet
Access to electricity
Needs: PODES (BPS) / VIIRS night lights
Not connected yet
Unemployment rate
Needs: BPS Sakernas (regency)
Not connected yet
Coastal sediment and tailings plumes
Needs: Sentinel-2/3 plume detection
Not connected yet
Degraded land (UNCCD method)
Needs: Trends.Earth (land cover, productivity, soil carbon)
Not connected yet
Distance to RPJMN 2025-2029 / RAD TPB targets
Needs: Metadata Indikator TPB (Bappenas) + RAD TPB per province/regency
Not connected yet
Trend per indicator (on track / moderate / stagnating / decreasing)
Needs: Yearly series of the axis A indicators
Not connected yet
Mercury / ASGM sites (unconfirmed signals)
Visible to trusted partners
Reclamation gap (disturbed minus reclaimed)
Visible with a free account
Schools within 5 km of mining footprint
No data for this subject
Health facilities within 5 km of mining footprint
No data for this subject
Abandoned mining land still bare or water (5+ years)
No data for this subject
Estimated mining effect per target (DiD / synthetic control)
Needs: Control areas (matching) + yearly series
Not connected yet
Permit change history (ESDM diff)
Needs: Weekly comparison of the ESDM permit register
Source is empty
Ultimate beneficial owners
Needs: Ultimate beneficial owners (AHU/OSS extract)
Not connected yet
Financial figures
Needs: Stock-exchange filings (IDX) and annual reports
No data for this subject
Company coverage score
Needs: Company coverage has not been calculated yet; this company is still in the queue.
No data for this subject
Pollution part of the affected area
Needs: Pollution part of the affected area (water, sediment and air measurements); only the physical footprint is measured today
Not connected yet

Sources

Kementerian ESDM geoportal (Minerba / Monaresia Wilayah Pertambangan), via legacy Eco Mining Data harvest · geoportal.esdm.go.id · retrieved 18 Oct 2026 · signal · unknown
Eco Mining Data computation: current permit geometries (ESDM) × area; overlap with WDPA protected areas · computed by Eco Mining Data · as of 18 Oct 2026 · signal · derived from the ESDM permit layer and WDPA (WDPA terms apply)Union of current permit geometries clipped to the subject; intersection with protected-area polygons; geodesic area
Eco Mining Data computation: mining footprint (Cheng et al. 2026 · Maus et al. 2022 · ESMI digitised) × subject; inside and outside current ESDM permit geometries · doi.org · computed by Eco Mining Data · as of 31 Dec 2019 · signal · derived from Cheng et al. 2026 and Maus et al. 2022 (CC BY-SA 4.0), ESMI digitised land and the ESDM permit layerFootprint polygons clipped to the subject (geodesic area), counted once where sources overlap (Cheng > Maus > ESMI); the part inside the union of current permit geometries vs outside known permit boundaries (ESDM). Outside is not a finding of illegality: it can be a data gap or an older permit.
Cheng et al. 2026 · Mining land-use classes inside global mining polygons (South-Eastern Asia) · doi.org · as of 31 Dec 2022 · signal · CC BY-SA 4.0
Maus et al. 2022 · Global-scale mining polygons (Version 2) · doi.org · as of 31 Dec 2019 · signal · CC BY-SA 4.0
Hansen Global Forest Change GFC-2025-v1.13 · glad.earthengine.app · as of 31 Dec 2025 · confirmed · CC BY 4.0Hansen, M. C. et al. 2013. High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change. Science 342: 850-53. Data: Global Forest Change 2000-2025 (v1.13), University of Maryland.
KLHK Onlimo water-quality monitoring, via legacy MI · retrieved 18 Oct 2026 · signal · unknown
Eco Mining Data computation: distance from each permit polygon to the nearest Global Mangrove Watch polygon (CC BY 4.0), search radius 50 km · www.globalmangrovewatch.org · computed by Eco Mining Data · as of 18 Oct 2026 · signal · derived from Global Mangrove Watch (CC BY 4.0) and the ESDM permit layerStraight-line distance between polygons; proximity, not a measured effect

2001	70	33	11	6	2	156	26	709	205

2002	82	31	10	6	2	154	29	702	201

2003	82	54	10	6	2	154	31	679	199

2004	111	49	9	10	2	147	35	667	189

2005	226	30	7	10	2	163	35	572	173

2006	320	79	6	14	2	196	21	437	143

2007	379	57	4	17	2	211	15	393	140

2008	441	56	4	20	2	226	13	331	126

2009	511	76	4	23	2	226	12	273	91

2010	485	110	4	24	2	255	9	249	80

2011	541	123	4	27	2	256	4	202	58

2012	593	147	5	28	2	242	3	164	34

2013	545	187	4	28	2	281	3	139	28

2014	548	178	7	29	2	307	3	119	26

2015	552	165	7	32	2	322	10	111	18

2016	472	188	8	34	2	367	11	118	18

2017	457	176	8	54	2	392	8	103	18

2018	461	146	9	57	2	420	8	100	15

2019	456	150	13	59	2	442	4	86	7

2020	370	178	9	59	2	510	0	83	6

2021	354	185	10	61	2	514	1	84	7

2022	393	127	9	61	2	519	2	97	6

2023	406	103	8	66	2	520	4	103	6

2024	386	73	11	74	3	524	12	132	6

2025	357	32	16	79	3	528	27	171	5

Show the numbers

Year	Mining ground	Bare ground	Water	Built-up	Oil palm	Farmland	Tree crops	Shrubs	Forest
1990	4	70	28	0	1	182	0	704	228
1991	0	83	19	4	1	180	0	703	228
1992	0	87	13	4	1	189	0	698	225
1993	1	87	9	4	1	199	0	691	226
1994	1	98	9	4	1	204	0	674	227
1995	1	117	9	4	1	206	0	657	222
1996	14	100	8	4	1	192	0	675	223
1997	16	93	8	5	1	176	0	696	223
1998	24	86	8	5	1	162	0	708	224
1999	50	58	10	5	2	163	0	709	221
2000	57	51	10	6	2	164	0	709	219
2001	70	33	11	6	2	156	26	709	205
2002	82	31	10	6	2	154	29	702	201
2003	82	54	10	6	2	154	31	679	199
2004	111	49	9	10	2	147	35	667	189
2005	226	30	7	10	2	163	35	572	173
2006	320	79	6	14	2	196	21	437	143
2007	379	57	4	17	2	211	15	393	140
2008	441	56	4	20	2	226	13	331	126
2009	511	76	4	23	2	226	12	273	91
2010	485	110	4	24	2	255	9	249	80
2011	541	123	4	27	2	256	4	202	58
2012	593	147	5	28	2	242	3	164	34
2013	545	187	4	28	2	281	3	139	28
2014	548	178	7	29	2	307	3	119	26
2015	552	165	7	32	2	322	10	111	18
2016	472	188	8	34	2	367	11	118	18
2017	457	176	8	54	2	392	8	103	18
2018	461	146	9	57	2	420	8	100	15
2019	456	150	13	59	2	442	4	86	7
2020	370	178	9	59	2	510	0	83	6
2021	354	185	10	61	2	514	1	84	7
2022	393	127	9	61	2	519	2	97	6
2023	406	103	8	66	2	520	4	103	6
2024	386	73	11	74	3	524	12	132	6
2025	357	32	16	79	3	528	27	171	5

PT Berkat Asia Mineralindo

Is this your company? Claim the profile for free with your registration number or work e-mail.

SDG scorecard

A · Context status

B · Target gap and trend

C · Mining

Facts

Who owns this

Holder changes

Where does the ore go

Mining footprint

Per source (own polygons)

Forest loss

Per year (last ten)

Recovery after mining

Area by status

Key years

Status per polygon

Promise versus reality

Company profile and coverage

Permits

Timeline

Own statements vs independent coverage

Own statement 0 own statements

Independent 0 independent articles

Mention volume

Tone over time

Right of reply

Observations

Financial and production figures

History of this profile

What we don't know yet

Sources

Promise versus reality

Where does the ore go

Own statements vs independent coverage

Own statement 0 own statements

Independent 0 independent articles

Mention volume

Tone over time

Right of reply

Media timeline

Recovery after mining

Area by status

Key years

Status per polygon

Who owns this

Holder changes