Eco Mining DataMining · Eco Watch⌘K
Press / to search, ⌘K for commandsEco Mining DataMining · Eco Watch112 ha · Jambi · You see this dossier without an account.
Built from public sources (ESDM, AHU, KLHK) and ESMI satellite analysis. Not written or endorsed by the company. Every change is logged.
1 permit is registered for this company.[1]
Own boundaries (ESDM permits, WDPA protected areas); no satellite imagery.
28/100
26/1008 more goals have no data yet (see “What we don’t know yet”).
Biggest gaps: SDG 6 (Major challenges) · SDG 15 (Significant challenges)
How the area is doing on measured SDG indicators (SDSN normalisation, 0–100).
Distance to RPJMN 2025–2029 / RAD TPB targets and the trend per indicator.
Exposure to mining, shown raw. Not attribution: the causal model (DiD, synthetic control) follows in S3.
No imputation: an indicator without data stays visibly empty. Goalposts and thresholds are in the indicator register.
The total counts land once where sources overlap (Cheng et al. 2026, then Maus et al. 2022, then ESMI digitised).
Adds up the 1 permits of this company; where permits overlap, the loss counts twice.
Loss means tree cover was removed: clearing, but also plantation harvest or fire. It is not a finding of illegal deforestation, and the data is yearly, not monthly.
Coverage has not been computed for this company yet.
No changes by the company yet.
No sourced promises are registered for this company yet. Nothing is assumed: a promise appears here only after it was quoted from a public document and checked by a second reviewer.
Reclamation plans, PPKH obligations, reforestation commitments, sustainability-report targets and zero-deforestation pledges are measured against the recovery status and the forest-loss record of the same land.
A grade compares a number in a document with a number from space. It does not judge intent or legality.
From the mines of this company to the industrial parks that most likely process their ore. What we know, what we infer and what we cannot see are kept apart.
For batubara we do not yet know the processing sites, so no chain can be drawn. Nickel is covered first.
These stages stay empty until a key is in place. We show the gap instead of guessing.
No own statements found.
No independent coverage found.
No reviewed incidents are linked to this organisation.
No monthly figures yet.
No tone scores yet.
No news is linked to this page yet.
After mining, most of the land became farmland or tree crops, or vegetation came back fast and evenly, as after planting.
Figures are sums over all polygons; the status of a group is the status with the largest area.
Peak mining 126 ha in 2019. In 2025: farmland 79 ha, water 56 ha, mining ground 39 ha.
| Year | Mining ground | Bare ground | Water | Farmland | Tree crops | Shrubs | Forest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 2 | 109 |
| 1991 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 73 | 0 | 2 | 102 |
| 1992 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 79 | 0 | 3 | 96 |
| 1993 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 71 | 3 | 2 | 101 |
| 1994 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 3 | 3 | 96 |
| 1995 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84 | 5 | 4 | 85 |
| 1996 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 81 | 14 | 3 | 79 |
| 1997 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85 | 13 | 2 | 78 |
| 1998 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 109 | 14 | 2 | 53 |
| 1999 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 107 | 19 | 2 | 49 |
| 2000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 107 | 19 | 2 | 50 |
| 2001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 103 | 29 | 1 | 44 |
| 2002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 35 | 0 | 45 |
| 2003 | 0 | 0 |
Whole footprint polygons, including parts outside this subject.
Satellite land cover, not reported reclamation: ESDM reclamation reports are not used. Sources: MapBiomas Indonesia Collection 5 (30 m, CC BY-SA 4.0), JRC Tropical Moist Forest; footprint Maus et al. 2022 and Cheng et al. 2026 (CC BY-SA 4.0); ESDM MODI permit layer. Method rec-1.0 · computed Oct 19, 2026
| 0 |
| 93 |
| 40 |
| 0 |
| 44 |
| 2004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 93 | 40 | 0 | 44 |
|---|
| 2005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 46 | 0 | 41 |
|---|
| 2006 | 23 | 13 | 0 | 65 | 56 | 0 | 20 |
|---|
| 2007 | 47 | 8 | 0 | 55 | 58 | 0 | 10 |
|---|
| 2008 | 57 | 22 | 0 | 42 | 52 | 0 | 5 |
|---|
| 2009 | 91 | 13 | 0 | 33 | 40 | 0 | 1 |
|---|
| 2010 | 97 | 12 | 4 | 38 | 24 | 0 | 2 |
|---|
| 2011 | 97 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 20 | 0 | 2 |
|---|
| 2012 | 101 | 3 | 14 | 46 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
|---|
| 2013 | 94 | 1 | 23 | 48 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
|---|
| 2014 | 93 | 1 | 33 | 38 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
|---|
| 2015 | 89 | 0 | 38 | 40 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
|---|
| 2016 | 97 | 0 | 39 | 34 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
|---|
| 2017 | 98 | 0 | 38 | 34 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
|---|
| 2018 | 115 | 0 | 34 | 25 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
|---|
| 2019 | 126 | 0 | 29 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| 2020 | 119 | 2 | 29 | 26 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| 2021 | 115 | 0 | 31 | 31 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| 2022 | 96 | 0 | 34 | 47 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| 2023 | 82 | 1 | 37 | 56 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| 2024 | 66 | 0 | 49 | 61 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| 2025 | 39 | 0 | 56 | 79 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
|---|
Peak mining 126 ha in 2019. In 2025: farmland 79 ha, water 56 ha, mining ground 39 ha.
| Year | Mining ground | Bare ground | Water | Farmland | Tree crops | Shrubs | Forest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 2 | 109 |
| 1991 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 73 | 0 | 2 | 102 |
| 1992 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 79 | 0 | 3 | 96 |
| 1993 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 71 | 3 | 2 | 101 |
| 1994 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 3 | 3 | 96 |
| 1995 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84 | 5 | 4 | 85 |
| 1996 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 81 | 14 | 3 | 79 |
| 1997 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85 | 13 | 2 | 78 |
| 1998 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 109 | 14 | 2 | 53 |
| 1999 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 107 | 19 | 2 | 49 |
| 2000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 107 | 19 | 2 | 50 |
| 2001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 103 | 29 | 1 | 44 |
| 2002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 35 | 0 | 45 |
| 2003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 93 | 40 | 0 | 44 |
| 2004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 93 | 40 | 0 | 44 |
| 2005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 46 | 0 | 41 |
| 2006 | 23 | 13 | 0 | 65 | 56 | 0 | 20 |
| 2007 | 47 | 8 | 0 | 55 | 58 | 0 | 10 |
| 2008 | 57 | 22 | 0 | 42 | 52 | 0 | 5 |
| 2009 | 91 | 13 | 0 | 33 | 40 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 97 | 12 | 4 | 38 | 24 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 97 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 20 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 101 | 3 | 14 | 46 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 94 | 1 | 23 | 48 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 93 | 1 | 33 | 38 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 89 | 0 | 38 | 40 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 97 | 0 | 39 | 34 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 98 | 0 | 38 | 34 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 115 | 0 | 34 | 25 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 126 | 0 | 29 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 119 | 2 | 29 | 26 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 115 | 0 | 31 | 31 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 96 | 0 | 34 | 47 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 82 | 1 | 37 | 56 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 66 | 0 | 49 | 61 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 39 | 0 | 56 | 79 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
From this company up to its group and down to its permits. Every link shows where it comes from and how sure we are.
The name in the official permit register. That is not always the company that owns the business.
The beneficial owner register of the Indonesian company authority (AHU / OSS) is only open under a formal agreement. Until then we do not guess names.
AHU: how to apply for accessNo owner or group above this company is in our data yet. The registered holder is all we can show for sure.
The holder history is part of the detail level. Sign in and complete your profile to see it. Sign in
These sources would add owners and the people behind them. They are switched off until a key or agreement is in place.
Ribbon thickness shows the stake where we know it. Dashed means a weaker or unstated link. A name is shown only for companies: natural persons are never named here.